Blogging reluctantly

by underscore

In the September/October 2004 EDUCAUSE Review, Stephen Downes said that “Blogging is about, first, reading…. If a student has nothing to blog about… it is because the student has not yet stretched out to the larger world, has not yet learned to meaningfully engage in a community.”

I’m wondering if he didn’t skip a point here.  Could it be that the student is not comfortable casting his/her thoughts out to all comers?  Could it be that the student is selective about his/her audience?

No disrespect to Mr. Downes; his overall point is that blogging is about engaging with content in a meaningful way, and I get that and agree with it, up to a point.  But, particularly in the life of a relatively young person (21 and under), I submit that there is value in mastering the face-to-face interaction before resorting to the cyber interaction.

I’m much influenced by the book Alone Together by Sherry Turkle, who is a psychologist studying human interaction with computers.  She has documented the increasing reluctance of young people to have conversations when they can text instead.  Even email is too involved (and too slow) for this generation. 

The nod of the head, the tilt of the eyebrow, the wrinkling of the forehead– these things have meaning face to face, but you have to learn to read them.  And I am concerned that we are raising generations of folks who are interpersonal cripples.  That may be overstating the case, but nonverbal communication is key to the development and display of things like empathy and altruism, which have been survival traits for the human race.  I’m not saying that blogging makes a blogger an automaton, but I am saying that it needs to be a tool in the box, not a replacement for the box.